Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Introduction

The Routers Reviewed

A few months back, a reader asked us to review a couple of entry-level draft 802.11n wireless routers. You know, the ones that sell for $50-$70 and have two, instead of three, antennas. His simple question was whether they performed as well as their more expensive three-antennas cousins. Well, one thing led to another and, before I knew it, I had six examples of the low-end of the latest flavor of Wi-Fi to hit the airwaves.

Since I have been posting test results, slideshows and mini-reviews for each product as I have gone along, this review will focus on analyzing the results and trying to answer the original question. And, yes, I'll name a "winner" among the group, which is comprised of:

  • Belkin N Wireless Router (F5D8233-4)
  • D-Link Wireless-N Router (DIR-615)
  • D-Link RangeBooster N Router (DIR-625)
  • Linksys Wireless-N Home Router (WRT150N)
  • Linksys Ultra RangePlus Wireless-N Broadband Router (WRT160N)
  • Trendnet 300Mbps Wireless N Home Router (TEW-632BRP)

Why this group? Well, the two D-Links were included because they are very similar in design and I wanted to see if they performed differently. I originally was going to look at just the WRT150N, which Linksys says has been its best-selling Draft 11n router. But since the recently-introduced WRT160N will be replacing it, I decided to do both. I rounded out the group with the Trendnet and Belkin products because both are inexpensive and met the two-antenna criteria. One other requirement for all products was that they had to be Wi-Fi Certified for 802.11n Draft 2.0.

I also asked each vendor to send a "recommended" USB or CardBus client adapter, which also had to be Draft 2.0 Certified. The adapters used in the testing were:

  • Belkin N Wireless Notebook Card (F5D8013 )
  • D-Link Wireless-N USB Adapter (DWA-130)
  • D-Link RangeBooster N Notebook Adapter (DWA-642)
  • Linksys Ultra RangePlus Dual-Band Wireless-N PC Card (WPC600N)

Trendnet sent its TEW-621PC card, but it couldn't be used since it didn't have connectors that were compatible with the Azimuth test system.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Running OpenVPN server on RT-AC5300 with latest merlin image.I can connect and access the LAN on the AC-5300 fine, I have another LAN segment on a swi...
I am struggling with arranging policy rules to my router to route the traffic.All source ips are 0.0.0.0and I have a list of around 90 ips that need t...
I`ve tried several methods to reconnect WAN (4G USB stick) through SSH but none of them worked. Is there a way (command) to reconnect WAN without rebo...
I have an 86U an 68U with Merlin 384.13. The 68U is setup in AP mode and is connected via ethernet to the 86U. I want to give AIMesh a try - main reas...
So i got a new Home Gateway installed as part of the 1Gbps upgrade i did with my ISP. Works like a charm, getting around 850/40 out of the 1000/40 sub...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3