Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless News

A key compromise reached in Draft 2.0 was to require that products operating in the 2.4 GHz band default to using the standard 20 MHz channel width that is backward-compatible with the majority of the 802.11b and g Wi-Fi networks in operation today. All Draft 2.0 Certified wireless access points and routers are supposed to "out of the box" power up using the compatible 20 MHz channel width mode.

The hole was discovered by SmallNetBuilder's Tim Higgins while testing a soon-to-be-released wireless router that had received Wi-Fi Draft 2.0 Certification. It was found that the router defaulted to using channel-bonded operation in the 2.4 GHz band, which was confirmed by monitoring the channels acutally used during the test. Higgins contacted the product vendor, who confirmed that the product had indeed passed Wi-Fi Certification.

Higgins' then passed his findings to Wi-Fi Alliance Lab personnel. They confirmed that the Draft 2.0 test plan specified that the use of 20 MHz channel bandwidth in the 2.4 GHz band was mandatory. But they also said that there was, in fact, no actual test performed to confirm compliance.

SmallNetBuilder requires that draft 11n products that it tests be Wi-Fi Draft 2.0 Certified. The unreleased product is the only Wi-Fi Certified product found to date to violate the Alliance's Certification 20 MHz mode "out of the box" requirement.

The Wi-Fi Alliance initiated its Draft 2.0 Certification program in June of this year to ensure product compliance with the interim draft standard. Products must pass an extensive test suite that is administered only in Wi-Fi Authorized Test Labs.

The Wi-Fi Alliance has not yet responded to a request for comment.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

I'm using cloudfare DNS servers & I also have DoT enabled. From what I understand all my DNS queries should be going through cloudfare servers but eve...
After updating to 384.18, all 8 of my Nest Protect devices went offline, and I was unable to add any new Protect devices onto my account. I have one 2...
Hi,So right now I have an Asus AC-5300 running Merlin.The house is Colonial with the family room on the side. So think Colonial house with an extra bo...
I tried to flash ddwrt to my archer 1750 and ended up bricking it . Does anyone know how to fix it??
Hi all,I'm using a (new in Dec 2019) RT-AX88U with Merlin 384.18 firmware, and previously 384.17 etc. I've always been running Merlin on this box. Thi...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3