Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS Reviews

Performance - Summaries

4.0.1 firmware was loaded on a TS-421 for our standard NAS test process. Given that all three models use the same processor, RAM and Ethernet components, all testing was done on the TS-421 sample. The TS-421 tests used four drives configured in single RAID 0, 5 and 10 volumes. The TS-221 tests used two drives in single RAID 0 and 1 volumes. The TS-121 tests used one drive.

As noted in the TS-421 review, times to completely build and resync 4 x 3 TB RAID 5 and 10 volumes were quite long at 17h 20m and 22h 30m, respectively. Unlike Thecus and Synology, QNAP does not offer the option to skip a bad block test, which can speed volume resync times significantly.

Since we have the NAS Ranker, I'll only make a few observations about each benchmark summary. The TS-421's Benchmark Summary below shows Windows File Copy write performance about the same (~44 MB/s) for RAID 0 and 10, but dropping to 36 MB/s for the more CPU-intensive RAID 5. File Copy read takes a different tack, with a slight upward trend from RAID 0 through RAID 10 (66, 72 and 73 MB/s).

NASPT File copy results are lower than their Windows File Copy counterparts across the board for both write and read.

QNAP TS-421 Benchmark Summary

QNAP TS-421 Benchmark Summary

Please note that I copied the Network Backup (rsync) results from the TS-421 to the TS-221 and TS-121 for NAS Ranker consistency. There rsync bug found in the original TS-421 review that required hand-editing of the rsync.conf file had not been fixed as of the retest.

With two drives representing the TS-221's performance, RAID 0 performance is slightly higher than with four drives. Windows file copy for RAID 1 measured 50 MB/s for write and 78 MB/s for read. NASPT file copy was also a bit higher (38 vs. 33 MB/s) for write and almost 15 MB/s higher for read.

QNAP TS-221 Benchmark Summary

QNAP TS-221 Benchmark Summary

With only a single drive, both write and read performance dipped to 46 and 71 MB/s for Windows file copy and 33 MB/s and 68 MB/s for NASPT file copy.

QNAP TS-121 Benchmark Summary

QNAP TS-121 Benchmark Summary

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

I've seen several threads here about people experiencing Link Down messages. I've confirmed that the issue is with my new Asus AC86U (which replaced a...
Hi. I purchased a used ac-5300. I had set it up it’s dual wan option with fall back selected. It worked fine for 2 days. Then on the 3rd day, I restar...
Not really sure how to describe this. I've been away for a couple of weeks, so nothing that I can think could/would have changed and I'm certain it wa...
On other stock firmware like Netgear and Linksys WRT, the network "map" would show whether a host was connected to main or guest or whatever. On OpenW...
After searching, I'm finding answers all over the board, and was hoping to help get some advice on how many devices (2.4 and 5GHz) that can connect to...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3